<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fedora core 5 and PostgreSQL may not be compatible</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.selfadhesivelabels.com/blog/2007/03/03/fedora-core-5-and-postgresql-may-not-be-compatible/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.selfadhesivelabels.com/blog/2007/03/03/fedora-core-5-and-postgresql-may-not-be-compatible/</link>
	<description>Describing our migration to open source software and UK business issues in label printing.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 09:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mercian Labels-a UK SME Label Printer blogging on Open Source migration &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Considering moving our Fasthosts dedciated server from Fedora5 to Ubuntu</title>
		<link>http://www.selfadhesivelabels.com/blog/2007/03/03/fedora-core-5-and-postgresql-may-not-be-compatible/#comment-1224</link>
		<dc:creator>Mercian Labels-a UK SME Label Printer blogging on Open Source migration &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Considering moving our Fasthosts dedciated server from Fedora5 to Ubuntu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 09:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.selfadhesivelabels.com/blog/?p=14#comment-1224</guid>
		<description>[...] this launch of ubuntu linux dedicated server hosting by Fasthosts, our main hosting company. In previous posts, I&#8217;ve been trying to find a solution for a long time to the problem of syncronising [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this launch of ubuntu linux dedicated server hosting by Fasthosts, our main hosting company. In previous posts, I&#8217;ve been trying to find a solution for a long time to the problem of syncronising [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Magnus</title>
		<link>http://www.selfadhesivelabels.com/blog/2007/03/03/fedora-core-5-and-postgresql-may-not-be-compatible/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>Magnus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 12:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.selfadhesivelabels.com/blog/?p=14#comment-63</guid>
		<description>Honestly, I think it is worth going through the pain now to find a different hosting company.  Fedora Core is, by design, less than ideal for long term hosting.  Fedora Core has a very rapid development cycle, and as you've learned (the hard way) a relatively recent distribution can fall out of maintenance quickly under a rapid release cycle.

CentOS, on the other hand, has a long slow development cycle.  CentOS 5 is still in beta but should have its stable release out at any moment.  CentOS 5 is for all intents and purposes a cleaned-up version of Fedora Core 6 so the migration for you would be much easier.  And you can continue on with the same distribution for years.

Another good option would be Ubuntu "dapper" 6.06 LTS.  Though honestly, I have some doubts about the Ubuntu project's claims that they will maintain this distribution for years.  Still, I find it to be a very easy environment to work in and some of my boxes do run Ubuntu.  Other releases of Ubuntu are under a rapid development cycle, much as Fedora Core, and would be less appropriate for long term hosting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly, I think it is worth going through the pain now to find a different hosting company.  Fedora Core is, by design, less than ideal for long term hosting.  Fedora Core has a very rapid development cycle, and as you&#8217;ve learned (the hard way) a relatively recent distribution can fall out of maintenance quickly under a rapid release cycle.</p>
<p>CentOS, on the other hand, has a long slow development cycle.  CentOS 5 is still in beta but should have its stable release out at any moment.  CentOS 5 is for all intents and purposes a cleaned-up version of Fedora Core 6 so the migration for you would be much easier.  And you can continue on with the same distribution for years.</p>
<p>Another good option would be Ubuntu &#8220;dapper&#8221; 6.06 LTS.  Though honestly, I have some doubts about the Ubuntu project&#8217;s claims that they will maintain this distribution for years.  Still, I find it to be a very easy environment to work in and some of my boxes do run Ubuntu.  Other releases of Ubuntu are under a rapid development cycle, much as Fedora Core, and would be less appropriate for long term hosting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian</title>
		<link>http://www.selfadhesivelabels.com/blog/2007/03/03/fedora-core-5-and-postgresql-may-not-be-compatible/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 11:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.selfadhesivelabels.com/blog/?p=14#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Hi David

Yes, we have heard of Centos, but there is one major problm for us in changing OS.  Fasthosts, our hosting company provide a complete package based on fedora, and all their support is fedora based.  I know that voming to centos, ubuntu, or any other distro will include pretty signifiacnt downtime and additional support costs.  I'd rather explore the upgrade routes first before deciding what to do.  Our contract with fasthosts is up in August, so by then we may have decied to setup a new dedicated webserver on centos, or ubuntu, and migrate then.

at this stage, all options are open!

thanks for the input</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David</p>
<p>Yes, we have heard of Centos, but there is one major problm for us in changing OS.  Fasthosts, our hosting company provide a complete package based on fedora, and all their support is fedora based.  I know that voming to centos, ubuntu, or any other distro will include pretty signifiacnt downtime and additional support costs.  I&#8217;d rather explore the upgrade routes first before deciding what to do.  Our contract with fasthosts is up in August, so by then we may have decied to setup a new dedicated webserver on centos, or ubuntu, and migrate then.</p>
<p>at this stage, all options are open!</p>
<p>thanks for the input</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Parker</title>
		<link>http://www.selfadhesivelabels.com/blog/2007/03/03/fedora-core-5-and-postgresql-may-not-be-compatible/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>David Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 02:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.selfadhesivelabels.com/blog/?p=14#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Have you looked at CentOS? It is a derivative of Redhat Enterprise Linux with many of its benefits and you don't need to buy licenses for updates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you looked at CentOS? It is a derivative of Redhat Enterprise Linux with many of its benefits and you don&#8217;t need to buy licenses for updates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia Hickey</title>
		<link>http://www.selfadhesivelabels.com/blog/2007/03/03/fedora-core-5-and-postgresql-may-not-be-compatible/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia Hickey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 13:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.selfadhesivelabels.com/blog/?p=14#comment-10</guid>
		<description>My comments above relate to your entry 'Research into open source'</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My comments above relate to your entry &#8216;Research into open source&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia Hickey</title>
		<link>http://www.selfadhesivelabels.com/blog/2007/03/03/fedora-core-5-and-postgresql-may-not-be-compatible/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia Hickey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 13:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.selfadhesivelabels.com/blog/?p=14#comment-9</guid>
		<description>hi Adrian

Thanks for your kind words regarding the help our team at OpenAdvantage, have provided.

I thought you might like to know of the new venture we have launched and in particular the areas of debate considered in the first tranche of topics.

Please see http://www.nationalopencentre.org.uk/activities/subject-panels. 
OS for SME's is one of the first and important areas that needs addressing. 
Open Standards and Public Procurement also.
We welcome you and everyone to get involved. 
Take a look at the rest of the site also - some valuable information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi Adrian</p>
<p>Thanks for your kind words regarding the help our team at OpenAdvantage, have provided.</p>
<p>I thought you might like to know of the new venture we have launched and in particular the areas of debate considered in the first tranche of topics.</p>
<p>Please see <a href="http://www.nationalopencentre.org.uk/activities/subject-panels" rel="nofollow">http://www.nationalopencentre.org.uk/activities/subject-panels</a>.<br />
OS for SME&#8217;s is one of the first and important areas that needs addressing.<br />
Open Standards and Public Procurement also.<br />
We welcome you and everyone to get involved.<br />
Take a look at the rest of the site also - some valuable information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
