<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Press release</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.selfadhesivelabels.com/blog/2007/03/16/press-release/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.selfadhesivelabels.com/blog/2007/03/16/press-release/</link>
	<description>Describing our migration to open source software and UK business issues in label printing.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 21:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adrian</title>
		<link>http://www.selfadhesivelabels.com/blog/2007/03/16/press-release/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 06:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.selfadhesivelabels.com/blog/2007/03/16/press-release/#comment-45</guid>
		<description>Hi Limulus

Thank you for this technical clarification which I accept.  I think the intended meaning comes across fine, but as you suggest, it is misquoted.

regs

adrian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Limulus</p>
<p>Thank you for this technical clarification which I accept.  I think the intended meaning comes across fine, but as you suggest, it is misquoted.</p>
<p>regs</p>
<p>adrian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Limulus</title>
		<link>http://www.selfadhesivelabels.com/blog/2007/03/16/press-release/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Limulus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 20:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.selfadhesivelabels.com/blog/2007/03/16/press-release/#comment-42</guid>
		<description>Where it says:

---
“free, as in speech, not beer”. This means that whilst the majority of open source desktop software does not have to be purchased, license savings have to be offset against the significant training and migration investment, and higher costs of consultancy support.”
---

That's not the intended meaning of the phrase; see http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html

---
"Free software" is a matter of liberty, not price. To understand the concept, you should think of "free" as in "free speech", not as in "free beer". Free software is a matter of the users' freedom to run, copy, distribute, study, change and improve the software.
---</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where it says:</p>
<p>&#8212;<br />
“free, as in speech, not beer”. This means that whilst the majority of open source desktop software does not have to be purchased, license savings have to be offset against the significant training and migration investment, and higher costs of consultancy support.”<br />
&#8212;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not the intended meaning of the phrase; see <a href="http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html</a></p>
<p>&#8212;<br />
&#8220;Free software&#8221; is a matter of liberty, not price. To understand the concept, you should think of &#8220;free&#8221; as in &#8220;free speech&#8221;, not as in &#8220;free beer&#8221;. Free software is a matter of the users&#8217; freedom to run, copy, distribute, study, change and improve the software.<br />
&#8212;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
