<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: support for &#8220;Ubuntu needs a secure remote desktop&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.selfadhesivelabels.com/blog/2007/07/15/support-for-ubuntu-needs-a-secure-remote-desktop/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.selfadhesivelabels.com/blog/2007/07/15/support-for-ubuntu-needs-a-secure-remote-desktop/</link>
	<description>Describing our migration to open source software and UK business issues in label printing.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 21:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Flaschen</title>
		<link>http://www.selfadhesivelabels.com/blog/2007/07/15/support-for-ubuntu-needs-a-secure-remote-desktop/#comment-1106</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Flaschen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 05:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.selfadhesivelabels.com/blog/2007/07/15/support-for-ubuntu-needs-a-secure-remote-desktop/#comment-1106</guid>
		<description>I don't see how the SSH+VNC solution is insecure.  True, it may not be polished yet, but that's a different issue.

Also, have you tried SSH+X ?  I don't know how you think it's far from being useful.  I just found it somewhat slow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see how the SSH+VNC solution is insecure.  True, it may not be polished yet, but that&#8217;s a different issue.</p>
<p>Also, have you tried SSH+X ?  I don&#8217;t know how you think it&#8217;s far from being useful.  I just found it somewhat slow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
